where b(r) [deg] is slope, q(r)is
water flow rate, Kt(r) is transportability coefficient,
which is dependent on soil and cover; m, n are constants that vary
according to type of flow and soil properties. For overland flow the constants are usually
set to m=1.6, n=1.3 (Foster 1993). Steady state water flow can be
expressed as a function of upslope contributing area per unit contour
width
A(r)[m]
where i[m] is uniform rainfall intensity (note: approximation by upslope area neglects the change in flow velocity due to cover). No experimental work was performed to develop parameters needed for USPED, therefore we use the USLE or RUSLE parameters to incorporate the approximate impact of soil and cover and obtain at least a relative estimate of net erosion and deposition. We assume that we can estimate sediment flow at sediment transport capacity as
ED = div (T . s) = d(T*cos a)/dx + d(T*sin a)/dy
where a [deg] is aspect of the elevation surface (or direction of flow minus gradient direction). Caution should be used when interpreting the results because the USLE parameters were developed for simple plane fields and detachment limited erosion. Therefore to obtain accurate quantitative predictions for complex terrain conditions they need to be re-calibrated ( Foster 1990, Mitasova et al 1997 reply).
The following equation shows the relationship between the erosion and deposition and shape of terrain given by its curvatures. For the uniform soil and cover properties represented by Kt=const., the net erosion/deposition rate is estimated as a divergence of the sediment flow (see Appendix in Mitas and Mitasova 1998):
where s(r) is the unit vector in the steepest slope direction,
h(r)
[m] is the water depth estimated from the upslope area
A(r),
kp(r)
is the profile curvature (terrain curvature in the direction of the steepest
slope), kt(r) is the tangential curvature
(curvature in the direction tangential to a contour line projected to the
normal plane). Topographic parameters s(r),
kp(r),
kt(r)
are computed from the first and second order derivatives of a terrain surface
approximated by RST (Mitasova and Mitas, 1993; Mitasova and Hofierka,
1993; Krcho 1991). According to the 2D formulation, the spatial distribution
of erosion and deposition is controlled by the change in the overland flow
depth (first term) and by the local geometry of terrain (second term),
including both profile and tangential curvatures. The bivariate formulation
thus demonstrates that the local acceleration of flow in both the gradient
and tangential directions, which are related to the profile and tangential
curvatures,
play equally important roles in the spatial distribution of erosion/deposition.
The interplay between the magnitude of water flow change and both
terrain curvatures reflected in the bivariate formulation determines whether
erosion or deposition will occur.
HOME H. Mitasova, et al., Geographic Modeling Systems Lab, UIUC |