-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION 1(west) 0-1km
this section has numerous problems with data:
-1999 almost 30% of the beach was missed by lidar and has no data
-after 2000 beach scarp was moving very rapidly inland (as opposed to relatively
stable dune toes in the sections 2-5) so the "back line" of the area
is moving over time and in 2004 also mhw gets over the road so there is no beach
in the section of 2004 data
units: area [ha, 10000m2] volume [m3]
change
year area vol area volume
1997 6.8 98664
1998 5.8 92324 1.0 6340
1999 no data
2000 4.2 80548 1.6 11776
2001 4.8 104500 -0.6 -23952 sand disposal
2002 3.3 36120 1.5 68380
2003 2.9 31800 0.4 4320
2004 1.0 5984 1.9 25816
----------------------------------------------
SECTION 2 1.-2.km
1997 5.3 81308
1998 4.5 65528 0.8 15780
1999 2.8 34944 1.7 30584
2000 1.7 21248 1.1 13696
2001 5.4 108836 -3.7 -87588 sand disposal
2002 4.1 54452 1.3 54384
2003 3.2 38244 0.9 16208
2004 1.6 13200 1.6 25044
--------------------------------------------
SECTION 3 2.-3.km
1997 2.8 33136
1998 2.4 25640 0.4 7496
1999 1.4 11320 1.0 14320
2000 0.5 2084 0.9 9236
2001 6.9 97808 -6.1 -95724 sand disposal
2002 5.8 73104 1.1 24704
2003 4.8 72720 1.0 384
2004 3.6 50764 1.2 21956
-----------------------------------------
SECTION 4 3.-4.km
1997 2.9 45008
1998 2.6 40392 0.3 4616
1999 1.4 13476 1.2 26916
2000 0.6 2060 0.8 11416
2001 7.5 103588 -6.9 -101528 sand disposal
2002 6.7 92120 0.8 11468
2003 6.1 97032 0.6 -4912 gain
2004 5.3 81820 0.8 15212
---------------------------------------
SECTION 5 4.-4.75km
1997 2.7 48480
1998 1.9 25568 0.8 22912
1999 1.1 8276 0.8 17292
2000 1.4 10032 -0.3 -1756 gain
2001 3.8 53348 -2.4 -43316 sand disposal
2002 3.7 49136 0.1 4212
2003 3.8 52256 -0.1 -3120 gain
2004 3.6 52792 0.2 -536 gain