decimation_test stdout

Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..100
105 points imported (limit was 105)
The rest of points was ignored


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
195 points imported
105 input points were skipped at the begging using offset


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
30 points imported
270 input points were skipped by count-based decimation


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
150 points imported
150 input points were skipped by count-based decimation


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
270 points imported
30 input points were skipped by count-based decimation


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
150 points imported
150 input points were skipped by count-based decimation


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
225 points imported
75 input points were skipped by count-based decimation


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
300 points imported


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..100
105 points imported (limit was 105)
11 input points were skipped by count-based decimation
The rest of points was ignored


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
200 points imported (limit was 299)
50 input points were skipped at the begging using offset
50 input points were skipped by count-based decimation
The rest of points was ignored


Projection of input dataset and current location appear to match
Scanning 300 points...
0..2..4..6..8..10..12..14..16..18..20..22..24..26..28..30..32..34..36..38..40..42..44..46..48..50..52..54..56..58..60..62..64..66..68..70..72..74..76..78..80..82..84..86..88..90..92..94..96..98..100
19 points imported
105 input points were skipped at the begging using offset
176 input points were skipped by count-based decimation